TAP Oscillators: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OooOkd_Dwrg0yCwhjlY0xMeqSsmy9Y8A/view?usp=sharing Aug-24, 2022] | | [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OooOkd_Dwrg0yCwhjlY0xMeqSsmy9Y8A/view?usp=sharing Aug-24, 2022] Test method: framework | ||
| | | | ||
Revision as of 20:48, 30 November 2022
Workstream #4
Objective
- Implementors needing to select oscillators for synchronizing networks in data centers face several challenges. Synchronization is a system-level requirement that is unclear how to satisfy by reading an oscillator datasheet. This makes it difficult and time consuming to select oscillators, leading to inconsistent and unpredictable PTP performance in the network. Therefore, the goal of this workstream is to specify classes of oscillators for common data center use cases to make it easier and faster to compare and select oscillators with high confidence to achieve a given level of PTP performance.
Project Team
- - Lead: Gary Giust (SiTime)
Documents
Recording from Past Calls
| Recordings | Slides |
|---|---|
| Nov-30, 2022 Class BC-1 osc specs, test method: daily aging | |
| Nov-16, 2022 Class BC-1 sys specs, test method: freq over temp slope | |
| Sep-21, 2022 Test method: freq stability over temp | |
| Aug-24, 2022 Test method: framework | |
| Jun-29, 2022 | |
| Apr-6, 2022 | |
| Mar-23, 2022 | |
| Feb-2, 2022 | |
| Jan-5, 2022 | |
| Dec-1, 2021 | |
| Sep-1, 2021; Sep-8, 2021; Sep-15, 2021; Sep-22, 2021 | |
| Aug-11, 2021; Aug-25, 2021 | |
| Jul-21, 2021 | |
| Jun-2, 2021;Jun-9, 2021; Jun-23, 2021 | |
| May-5, 2021; May-12, 2021; May-19, 2021, May-26 2021 | |
| Apr-7, 2021; Apr-14, 2021;Apr-21, 2021;Apr-28, 2021; | |
| Mar-18, 2021; Mar-31, 2021; | Mar-18, 2021 |